Total Pageviews

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Edward Villella Departs Miami City Ballet Early

By DANIEL J. WAKIN

Edward Villella, the ousted patriarch of the Miami City Ballet, is making an early exit from the stage. Under the hawklike gaze of lawyers, the company and Mr. Villella said on Tuesday that he would leave as artistic director immediately instead of next April.
Mr. Villella, 75, a magnetic star of New York City Ballet under George Balanchine, said he had cleaned out his office over the weekend and would return to New York next week with his wife to house hunt.
“I want to get on with my life,” Mr. Villella said in a telephone interview. “I have more to contribute and I want to start contributing.”
The development was the latest turn in the long and painful separation between the company and Mr. Villella, who helped establish Miami City Ballet in 1985 and turned it into a major regional ballet ensemble that has made its mark around the country and abroad.
But Mr. Villella's relationship with Miami City Ballet grew sour in 2011. That November, the company announced his eventual departure, calling it a mutual decision. But friends and supporters of Mr. Villella, and other sources familiar with the company's operations (who spoke anonymously to avoid damaging its reputation), said he was forced out because of frictions with an influential group of board members over fund-raising and personality issues.
An executive director, Nicholas T. Goldsborough, *was brought in that month to focus on raising money but was gone by June. Lourdes Lopez, *a former New York City Ballet dancer, was designated by the board as Mr. Villella's successor as artistic director. The board also brought in Michael M. Kaiser, *the president of the Kennedy Center and a noted turna round specialist, to give advice and hired an outside public relations firm.
On Tuesday, both sides declined to comment on the sped-up departure. A company news release said the decision was Mr. Villella's. It issued a statement under his name saying, “I have decided that with the leadership position plan well under way, it is best for me to leave the company now.”
But both sides dropped enough hints to imply that a legal tussle was involved.
“This is all a legal issue now,” said Roberto Santiago, a company spokesman. “Attorneys on both sides will take your questions.” He added that company lawyers would take queries only in writing. Mr. Villella declined to give the name of his lawyer.
When asked if the reticence was based on a confidentiality agreement, Mr. Villella said: “Certain things are obvious.” He continued, “This is something we were all aware of, that there were complications, and they have arrive d.”
Mr. Villella said no lawsuits had been filed, and that he did not want to bring a case. “I don't want to jeopardize the company in any way,” he said. “If I did that it would be a major statement and it's not what I'm about. I don't want to do anything that would be detrimental to my dancers - my former dancers. Those kids are amazing. They have made me look good. I appreciate them.”
When asked if any legal action was threatened, he said, “I will allow you to use your imagination.”



\'Flashdance\' Musical Set for Broadway in August 2013

By ERIK PIEPENBURG

The stage adaptation of “Flashdance,” based on the 1983 movie about a female welder-dancer, will begin performances on Broadway in Aug. 2013, the show's producers announced on Tuesday. A theater, dates and casting are still to be announced.

A Broadway run of “Flashdance” has been in the works for several years. Following a 2010 London production, a group of veteran theater producers announced last year that the show would come to Broadway in the fall of 2012. In May of this year, however, the producer Marc Routh said the show would be pushed to spring 2013, citing a lack of available Broadway theaters this fall, and to give time for more work to be done on the show.

In an interview Mr. Ro uth said an August opening would give the show more attention than if it opened in the fall or spring, as most Broadway shows do.

“I think one of the advantages is that with our title, we're not relying on being blessed by the critics,” he said. “The tourist market, the primary summer market, is well aware of our title. On audience surveys it ranks high for what people want to see. We're optimistic of being able to attract audiences.”

Before its Broadway opening the show will embark on a North American tour with a production separate from the one that will play Broadway. The tour starts in Jan. 2013 in Pittsburgh, where the film is set.

The musical version of “Flashdance” features a book by Tom Hedley (who co-wrote the original screenplay with Joe Eszterhas), and Robert Cary; music by Robbie Roth; lyrics by Mr. Cary and Mr. Roth; and direction and choreography by Sergio Trujillo (“Jersey Boys”). The score includes original numbers and hit so ngs from the film, including “Maniac,” “Gloria” and “Flashdance … What a Feeling.”

As for casting, Mr. Routh didn't tip his hat. But like “Flashdance” the film, which made Jennifer Beals a star, Mr. Routh said “Flashdance” the musical has the potential to be a “star-making” production.

“There could easily be a name involved but at this point there's not,” he said. “The female lead is so monumental. She has to be an amazing triple threat performer.”



DC Introducing an Arab-American Character

By GEORGE GENE GUSTINES

When the DC universe of superheroes was reintroduced last year one of the commitments from the company was diversity. Cyborg, a black hero, was promoted to the Justice League; Bunker, a new Teen Titan, is Mexican and gay; and female or minority-group characters were the headliners in many series.

DC is continuing that push with the introduction of Simon Baz, an Arab-American from Michigan, who finds himself wearing a Green Lantern power ring. His story unfolds in issue No. 0 of “Green Lantern,” which is part of a mont-long zero-issue event from DC Comics, that promises to shed light on the new back stories of its heroes. “Green Lantern” is written by Geoff Johns, who drew upon his own Leb anese ancestry and Michigan roots for the character. “This is such a personal story,” Mr. Johns told The Associated Press.

The story opens with Simon, as a child with his sister and parents, watching the events of 9/11 unfold on television. The next day, an Islamic Center is defaced with graffiti that says “Go home” and “Murderers.” Ten years later, the comic depicts him being detained by airport security for a “routine” search and, now, a run-in with the law, makes him a national security concern. His interrogation is interrupted by the emerald power ring of Green Lantern, which whisks him away. The story, to be sure, is to be continued in coming months. On Saturday, Mr. Johns will make an appearance at the Arab American National Museum in Dearborn, Mich., to discuss the character and his career.



Rollings Stones\' Greatest Hits Album to Offer 2 New Songs

By JAMES C. MCKINLEY JR.

The Rolling Stones will release two new original songs when they put out a greatest hits record in November, Mojo magazine reported on Tuesday.  The two songs â€" entitled “Gloom and Doom” and “One Last Shot” â€" were recorded in Paris last month and will appear on a three-CD set of the band's hits, “GRRR!,” which is set to be released on Nov. 13.

The songs will be the first new material the Stones have generated since the recording sessions for their 2005 album “A Bigger Bang,” Billboard reported.  The band has several projects in the works to mark their 50th anniversary. (Their first show was at Marquee Club in London in July 1962.)  Besides “GRRR!,” the Stones will also release in mid-November “Crossfire Hurricane,” a documentary movie about their early years.

 There have been unconfirmed reports in Rolling Stone magazine and other publications that the Stones will do two shows at the new Barclays Center in Brooklyn this fall, but a publicist for the group said no plans for concerts have been finalized.



Target Margin to Explore Yiddish Theater

By FELICIA R. LEE

Target Margin Theater, the alternative New York theater company known for its frisky interpretations of plays ranging from Shakespeare to Brecht, is turning its attention to Yiddish theater. The company has announced a two-season exploration of Yiddish theater called “Beyond the Pale,”  which begins with a festival of plays, readings, a scholarly panel and a concert of Yiddish music, to be held Oct. 17 through Nov. 3 at The Brick in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. The festival, all in English, will present four fully staged plays including “God, Man, and Devil,” the circa 1900 play by Jacob Gordin, an influential Yiddish dramatist. In March, Target Margin will present a reworked drama from the Yiddish canon at the Abrons Art Center at the Henry Street Settlement on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. Other productions, workshops and concerts are also planned.

“As I have learned about Yiddish theater in the last couple of years I've come to appreciate the range and sophistication of Yiddish theater and I want people to realize what is out there,” David Herskovits, artistic director of Target Margin said Tuesday. “The festival is the kickoff for big productions, little productions, readings and short presentations.” A dozen Yiddish theaters thrived in New York City in the early 20th century.



Vince Gilligan on \'Breaking Bad\' and \'the Plumbing of It All\'

By DAVE ITZKOFF

Warning: this post contains spoilers about Season 5 of “Breaking Bad” and Sunday's semi-season finale.

How much more tension could “Breaking Bad” provide in its recent mini-season? In eight all-too-short episodes, viewers of that AMC series bit their fingernails down to their nubs watching a high-tech, hands-free heist on a police evidence locker; a train robbery with unexpectedly lethal results; a very depressing birthday party for the meth-making protagonist, Walter White (Bryan Cranston); and a final showdown between Walter and his sometime ally Mike Ehrmantraut (Jonathan Banks). And just when the prison stabbings and retaliatory killings had come to an end; Jesse Pinkman (Aaron Paul) had been paid his share; the White family had assembled for a happy gathering; and we had prepared for Semisonic's “Closing Time” to start playing, Hank (Dean Norris) made a surprising discovery that could blow open Walter's secre t identity as Albuquerque's leading drug kingpin.

Now comes the most suspenseful moment of all: waiting almost an entire year for the next eight episodes of “Breaking Bad,” which will close out the season, the series and the story of Walter White. To tide us over until then, Vince Gilligan, the creator and show runner of “Breaking Bad,” spoke to reporters on Tuesday in a telephone news conference. In these edited excerpts from that discussion, Mr. Gilligan talks about Sunday's episode, the season so far and what's to come in the show's final installments.

Are we to believe that Walt has done his last cook? Is he out, or are we supposed to be guessing?

I guess you're always supposed to be guessing when you're watching “Breaking Bad.” As Walt said to his wife in that last act, he said, “I'm out.” And we can either take him at his word or not. He is of course infamous for being one of the world's greatest liars. But I tend to believe personally he was telling the truth when he told her that. Have we witnessed him cooking his last batch? Hard to say. I could be coy and simply say I'm not going to tell you. But on the other hand, we're still working out the final eight episodes. My writers and I don't completely know how it's going to quite lay out as of yet. I'm not even sure of the answer myself. But it's looking like he's out of the business for sure.

What reassurances might you have for Aaron Paul fans who might be afraid that he won't have much to do moving forward?

Oh, he's going to have plenty to do. Let me reassure you on that count. [laughs] Just because he's out of the business doesn't mean he's off the show. We love Jesse Pinkman as much as all the multitude of Aaron Paul fans out there love him. It would not be the same show without Jesse Pinkman on it.

You began Season 5 with a framing device that showed Walt at a certain place and time in his life. But w e haven't yet seen how Walt becomes the person in that scenario. How much of your final eight episodes have you worked out, and did you know, going into these most recent eight, how they would connect with however you intend to end the series?

That flash-forward, with the Denny's and Walt looking a bit like the Unabomber and purchasing an M-60 machine gun in the back of an old Cadillac, is a glimpse forward to the future, and it is a future that is about a year ahead â€" 10 to 12 months ahead from the time of the first eight episodes. It is a glimpse to the end of it all? Perhaps. It is something we are still nailing down. You'd be surprised at how little we have at this point. [laughs] I hate to admit it. We have the broad strokes for the final eight, but I've always loved that there are two opposing clichés â€" God is in the details and the devil is in the details. I love the fact that those two clichés are in opposition, and yet they both hold true. What remains i s very much in the details. We have the broad strokes of what all of that means, that M-60 machine gun in the trunk of the Cadillac and whatnot. But it's the connective tissue that will tell the tale. The plumbing of it all â€" the laying of the pipe of it all â€" that will tell us whether we've succeeded or failed in coming up with a satisfying ending.

What are you prepared to tell us at this point about the story of the final eight episodes?

This is where it all comes to an end. There will be resolution in these final eight. We will know where everybody stands. Gosh, what can I say about it? I'm being very maddeningly vague and general. We are going to swing for the fences in these final eight episodes. It's terrifying, and yet it's liberating for me and for the writers to know that these are the final eight hours that we'll ever have for this series. There's been talk of a movie and whatnot, but I can tell you that none of that is even remotely on my radar rig ht now. As far as I'm concerned, the end of this story is contained within these final eight episodes. We now have freedom, carte blanche I suppose, to dispense with the timid, pusillanimous storytelling we've been doing so far.

How will Hank handle the information he just put together?

That is the big question, isn't it? Unfortunately I have to be a little coy about what he is going to do. But I can tell you this, it has been the subject of great debate among the seven writers, myself included. You run through every possible permutation in your head. Does he just walk right out and shoot him right in the forehead? What are the various possibilities? How do you react to something like this? Do you keep your cards close to the vest or are you able to control those emotions that you would feel? And do you feel them all at once or is it a slow burn? Are you in a state of shock? It's hard to put oneself into Hank's head in that moment, because you've to think, that's the single biggest, most horrible revelation this guy's probably ever had in his life. This guy, who he loves, who he has brotherly love and affection for â€" they're only related by marriage, but they oftentimes do feel like brothers, not just brothers-in-law â€" that knowledge, how does one take it all in and process it in a mere matter of seconds? I hate to tell you how many man hours we've spent talking this stuff through.

Why did you decide to end on the scene of Hank sitting on the toilet?

We wanted an ending for a season that was different than any other season ending that we'd had before. We're always trying to keep track of what we've done in the past, in an effort to try to turn particular moments on their ear. We've had a season end, a first season, in which we were in a junkyard and watched a really scary, methed-up drug dealer beat one of his underlings to death. We've had a season that ended, literally, with a plane crashing into Walt's backyard. A nd that we had Jesse shoot a guy in the face. We figured [laughs] perhaps the most interesting ending would be, on the face of it, the least dramatic â€" a guy sitting on the toilet and having the biggest revelation of his life, while seated on the porcelain throne, there. It seemed to us irresistible â€" the irony of it and the undramatic, at least on the surface, nature of it felt appropriate to us.

Where do you see Walt and Jesse's relationship, moving forward into the last eight episodes, coming out of their last scene together?

That last scene had a very bittersweet feel, a very nostalgic feel to it, for me and for our writers. Moira Walley-Beckett, who wrote that episode, did a wonderful job with that scene, and it feels like a goodbye scene between those two characters. It feels like a reminiscing about the past, about better times â€" [laughs] better times are a relative idea in the world of “Breaking Bad.” They are reminiscing, after all, about cooki ng meth. There was a more innocent time on this show, and they are thinking about that, and what they're essentially saying is that those days are over and they can never be returned to.

Going forward it's less about the assistant or the acolyte attending to the master or the mentor and more about partners on an equal footing, or former partners. We'll see whether they are â€" uh, gee, I'm getting into territory where I don't want to give too much away. But basically Walt and Jesse are very much â€" not necessarily intellectually equals, but speaking in terms of formidability â€" is that a word? formidableness? â€" they are very much closer to being equals than they've ever been before. As to how that particular fact will inform our storytelling in the final eight remains to be seen.

That scene of Walt saying he's out comes after a visit to the doctor's office. Is it safe to say his human side came out of whatever he learned at that doctor's office? How important will that be in the end game of the show?

Good attention to detail there. The best way to put it is, we really try never to have a scene in our show that adds up to nothing. Every scene â€" if you go to the trouble of asking your crew to build a set and shoot a scene, it damn well ought to be important. So going forward, every scene is important. There were probably a lot of good reasons for Walt to walk into the kitchen and say to his wife, “I'm out.” She gave him a damn good one at the end of the previous act, when she showed him all that money. She basically explained to him that this is just a giant pile of paper that, at this point, we can't even do anything with. How much is enough? How big does this pile have to be? That right there, that's a good reason to quit.

If this show had ended with Season 4, let's say, you could have had a conclusion where everything worked out Walt's way. Does the morality of the show dictate that there has to be an unhappy ending for him, that in some way he has to atone for all the things he's done?

He doesn't have to. Of course, as we all know, people get away with murder every day. Someone in real life is getting away with murder as we speak, somewhere in the word. Probably, with seven billion souls on the planet, mathematically speaking, hundreds of people right now are getting away with murder. Walt could end no differently than that. He could get away with the whole thing. I guess the question more precisely becomes, How satisfying would that be? What would satisfy the audience at the end of it all?

Speaking for myself, I find myself feeling a great deal of ambivalence toward this guy. Some days I'm rooting for him, some days I want to see him get hit by a car. A big question, what's the most satisfying way to end this thing? But then, having said that, is the satisfying way the right way? Without giving anything away, these are the questions we ask ourselves constantly. We s top ourselves every now and then and say: What are our hopes and dreams here? What do we want to see happen? And then we take a consensus around the room, and very often we're all on the same page with what we want to see happen. And then we say, is that the right thing to happen? What's the point of it all? What's the point we want to make? Do we even have one? Some days I'm not sure we do. But then plenty of days, it's just enough to tell a gripping story, to have showmanship and drama and moments and shock and awe, as it were. We go back and forth a lot. It's very much a work in progress.



Fuse Introduces \'Fuse News,\' With Some Recognizable Hosts

By DAVE ITZKOFF

Fuse, the music-themed cable channel that mixes videos and documentaries with offbeat fare like the comedy game show “Funny or Die's Billy on the Street,” is increasing its commitment to music journalism. On Tuesday it is expected to announce that it is creating a dedicated news division and introducing a daily news show whose hosts may be familiar to viewers of its sometime rival MTV.

The show, called “Fuse News,” will be broadcast live, Monday through Friday, from the channel's studio on Seventh Avenue in Manhattan (near the home of Fuse's corporate parent, the Madison Square Garden Company).

“Fuse News” will run a half-hour each day and will be anchored in New York by Ashanti, the R&B singer and actress; Elaine Moran, a TV and online journalist; and Alexa Chung, a model and television personality who hosted a short-lived daily series on MTV, “It's On With Alexa Chung.”

The show's West Coast anchor, based in Los Angeles, will be Jack Osbourne, an alumnus of the vintage-2000s MTV reality show “The Osbournes.” (Mr. Osbourne, who recently disclosed that he has multiple sclerosis, also factored into announcements by his mother, Sharon Osbourne, that she would leave her hosting position on the NBC series “America's Got Talent.” Ms. Osbourne has said NBC reneged on a commitment to allow Mr. Osbourne to appear on its reality competition “Stars Earn Stripes”; NBC said he never had a contract for the show.)

A debut date for “Fuse News” was not immediately announced. Fuse said in a statement that starting on Sept. 10 it would begin “to deliver breaking news across its television and online platforms and, after completing some techn ical refinements, will follow with the roll out of its new show, which will take its news initiative a step further by capturing the stories of the day and providing context.”