Total Pageviews

Friday, May 31, 2013

Tornadoes Tear Through Central Oklahoma

Twelve days after a tornado ravaged Moore, Okla., killing 24 people and leveling entire neighborhoods, residents scrambled for cover again on Friday night as another tornado struck their town and nearby Oklahoma City.

Once again, the National Weather Service issued an unusual “dangerous” tornado warning for the Oklahoma City area as multiple tornadoes carved paths of destruction from west to east across central Oklahoma, flipping cars, downing power lines and ripping off roofs.

KFOR-TV, the local NBC affiliate, was providing live online coverage Friday night.

The Oklahoma Highway Patrol told The Associated Press that a number of motorists were injured and numerous vehicles damaged, and that a few motorists appeared to be missing.

Sean Schofer, a storm chaser, posted this photo on Twitter of a Weather Channel vehicle damaged by the storm.

An evacuation was ordered for Will Rogers World Airport southwest of Oklahoma City, and those left behind as the tornado approached were directed to underground tunnels.

Power outages led to the cancellation of all flights in and out of the airport Friday night. Local news outlets reported that 65,000 customers were without power in central Oklahoma.

An NBC correspondent, Janet Shamlian, was among those in the airport tunnels. She later reported seeing debris, high waters and no power outside the airport.

In addition to the high winds, residents in and around Oklahoma City are dealing with flash flooding, according to Jim Cantore of the Weather Channel.



Dramatic Scenes From Houston Fire

Friday may have been the deadliest day in the history of the Houston Fire Department, officials said, with four firefighters killed while battling a five-alarm blaze that ripped through a large motel on the city’s busy Southwest Freeway. Five more firefighters were taken to area hospitals with injuries, but little information about their condition was available on Friday evening.

A cameraman for a local Fox affiliate in Houston captured dramatic footage of the fire and its aftermath from a helicopter flying above the scene on Friday afternoon. Towering flames leapt from the roof of the motel, the Southwest Inn, and dark smoke hung in the sky overhead. The front section of the building appeared to have collapsed.

.nytVideo, .nytVideo video, .youtubeVideo, .youtubeVideo iframe { background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #000000; } .youtubeVideo { position: relative; } .youtubeVideo, .youtubeVideo .thumb { height: 0; padding-bottom: 56.25%; } .youtubeVideo iframe { height: 100%; left: 0; position: absolute; top: 0; width: 100%; z-index: 1; } .youtubeVideo .playButton { border-radius: 10px 10px 10px 10px; height: 46px; left: 50%; margin: -23px 0 0 -35px; position: absolute; top: 50%; width: 70px; z-index: 2; background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(90deg, #6e0610, #ff0000); /* Safari 5.1+, Mobile Safari, Chrome 10+ */ background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(90deg, #6e0610, #ff0000); /* Firefox 3.6+ */ background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(90deg, #6e0610, #ff0000); /* IE 10+ */ background-image: -o-linear-gradient(90deg, #6e0610, #ff0000); /* Opera 11.10+ */ } .youtubeVideo .thumb { overflow: hidden; width: 100%; } .youtubeVideo .thumb img { height: auto; width: 100%; margin-top:-45px; } .youtubeVideo:hover .thumb { cursor: pointer; } .youtubeVideo:hover .playButton { } .youtubeVideo .playButton .arrow { border-bottom: 10px solid transparent; border-left: 20px solid #FFFFFF; border-top: 10px solid transparent; height: 0; left: 28px; position: absolute; top: 13px; width: 0; } .clearfix:after { clear: both; content: "."; display: block; height: 0; visibility: hidden; }

A Fox news affiliate in Houston captured dramatic footage of the fire and its aftermath.
An update posted to Vine, a social media video service, by a user who identified himself as Joshua Kyle Hoppe appeared to show the collapsed front of the Southwest Inn. The video appeared to have been taken from a car driving past the damaged building at some point after the fire was brought under control.

Speaking to The Associated Press, Janice Evans, a spokeswoman for Mayor Annise Parker, said she believed Friday to be the deadliest day in the fire department’s 116-year history.

“It’s a very sad day for the Houston Fire Department and the city of Houston as a whole,” Ms. Evans said.



Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Kremlin-Owned Network Hires Larry King

A YouTube trailer for Larry King’s new talk show on a Russian government satellite channel.

The Russian government’s satellite news network Russia Today, or RT, announced on Wednesday that it had hired Larry King to “host a mold-breaking political talk show” for its American channel.

A brief online trailer for the new show featuring Mr. King, 79, displayed a series of words associated with the host in the minds of his new employers â€" “critical thinker,” “hard-nosed,” “depth,” “intelligence,” and “suspenders” â€" that some of his critics might take issue with. (Readers who want to brush up on their Russian can view a copy of the trailer subtitled and dubbed into that language.)

Given that the Kremlin-owned network devotes considerable air time to critics of the American government, and finds fault with President Vladimir Putin’s rule about as often as Fox News produces exposés on the Republican Party, the hiring of the 79-year-old American prompted a stream of mocking comments from Russian skeptics and the foreign press corps in Moscow.

While the Irish editor of the Russian network’s Web site, Ivor Cotty, mocked the mockers, and said that he was enthused about the new hire, a business news blogger based in Moscow suggested that Mr. King’s record as an interviewer of Mr. Putin did not inspire confidence.

Indeed, during an interview in New York in late 2000, Mr. King did not get very much from Mr. Putin when he asked about an embarrassing episode, the sinking of the nuclear submarine Kursk that year, which had cost 118 crew members their lives.

Part of Larry King’s interview with President Vladimir Putin in 2000.

In fact, as Max Read recalled in a Gawker post on Mr. King’s post-modern defection, the host even said in an interview with RT in 2011 that he is something of a fan of Mr. Putin.

Larry King talking about Vladimir Putin in an interview with RT in 2011.

Asked in that interview how Mr. Putin had come to be one of the final guests on his CNN talk show in late 2010, Mr. King replied:

I got along with Mr. Putin very well. When I met him at the U.N. conference, some years ago, I didn’t know it was 10 years ago, I immediately had a good rapport with him. I liked him very much. And so we thought of who would be the best guests.

And, I don’t know if this is generally known, but he asked to come on. He said he watched the show almost all the time and he knew I was leaving and he’d like to come on. And then he invited me to come â€" I’m coming next May to Moscow to spend some time with him. I had a â€" hard to explain, I had an affinity with him. You try to get that with a lot of guests, but I really had it with him.

As I said to some friends of mine, Vladimir Putin, if he were American, would be a successful American politician. He has a quality, this has nothing to do with politics… They change a room. They have a certain magnetism. And he has ‘it,’ whatever ‘it’ is. He has ‘it.’

Later in the same interview with RT, Mr. King shared more on his first impressions of Mr. Putin, saying: “I liked him right away. The crew liked him…. I loved his answer when I asked him what happened with the submarine and he just said, ‘it sunk,’ but that wonderful pause he took. I find him engaging, I liked him right away. You know there’s certain people that come into your life that you like. I liked him.”

As my colleague Ellen Barry observed in a report on Mr. Putin’s 2010 appearance on one of the last episodes of “Larry King Live” on CNN: “Mr. King, whose program is carried on CNN’s channels around the world, has long had a reputation for softball questions. So Mr. Putin’s decision to appear on the program allowed his voice to be heard both in the United States and abroad while avoiding being challenged on contentious topics like his own grip on power and the limits on human rights and free speech in Russia.”

The new talk show, which is a collaboration with the producers of Mr. King’s current program for the online network Ora.tv (a site financed by Carlos Slim Helú, the Mexican billionaire who also owns a share of The New York Times) is not the host’s first work for RT. Last year he hosted a debate among third-party candidates for the American presidency that was broadcast on RT.

Although the Kremlin-owned network, which broadcasts in English, Spanish and Arabic, is promoted on the Russian foreign ministry’s Web site as a source of information, alongside other official channels, a detailed press release about the new show from Ora.tv made no mention of the network’s government sponsorship at all.

Margarita Simonyan, the young editor-in-chief of RT, gushed about hiring Mr. King on her Twitter feed on Wednesday, and accepted congratulations from the network’s fans.

Although the network aims to present the news from the Russian government’s perspective to viewers abroad, and so does not broadcast inside the country, here state television does similar work, the opposition activist and blogger Aleksei Navalny did retweet a series of jokes about Mr. King’s salary posted online by other bloggers. One of those jokes compared Mr. King’s salary from the Kremlin to the money paid to a series of fading soccer stars who have recently signed lucrative contracts to play for a professional team in the troubled Russian republic of Dagestan.

Robert Mackey also remixes the news on Twitter @robertmackey.

Follow Andrew Roth on Twitter @ARothmsk.



Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Candidate for Iran’s Presidency Defends Record as Nuclear Negotiator

The brief campaign ahead of next month’s presidential election in Iran might lack the passion of 2009, when rallies in support of opposition candidates set the stage for the mass protests that followed the vote, but one of the candidates injected some passion into the race on Monday when he showed a flash of anger anger during an interview on state television.

The candidate, Hassan Rouhani, is a moderate cleric who served as an Iranian nuclear negotiator during the presidency of the reformist Mohammad Khatami. When he was challenged on his record during that period by the state television interviewer, Hassan Abedini, Mr. Rouhani reacted with indignation.

An excerpt from an interview with Hassan Rouhani, a presidential candidate, broadcast on Iranian state television on Monday.

An interview excerpt posted on a YouTube channel set up in support of Mr. Rouhani’s campaign shows that the candidate first accused the host of lying â€" by suggesting that Iran’s nuclear program had been suspended as a result of his work â€" and then criticized the state-run television channel, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, or IRIB, more broadly.

As the blogger Arash Karami explained in a detailed post on the interview, Mr. Rouhani said that his work from 2003 to 2005 was “during the era of Bush, when crazy neocons had attacked Afghanistan, occupied Iraq and everyone said that Iran is next.”

When Mr. Abedini said that Iran’s nuclear work had halted as a result of the negotiations the candidate took part in, Mr. Rouhani interrupted to say: “What you said is a lie, you know it’s a lie. This talk is what ignorant people say, you are versed in this.” He added: “Maybe the person speaking to you in your earpiece doesn’t know, but you know.”

After he was pressed further by the host, Mr. Rouhani said, according to Mr. Karami’s translation: “We suspended the program? We completed the program. This is unethical behavior of the IRIB that has gotten into you. And the person who is speaking into your earpiece, this unethical behavior has gotten into him too.”

The clash came in the context of Mr. Rouhani’s effort to defeat a more prominent candidate, Saeed Jalili, Iran’s current nuclear negotiator who has made his hardline stance a centerpiece of his campaign.

In a series of messages posted on Twitter after the interview was broadcast, Mr. Jalili’s campaign pursued the argument that three agreements struck during Mr. Rouhani’s period in charge, which were mentioned by Mr. Abedini, did effectively force Iran to suspend its nuclear program.

Later in the interview, Mr. Rouhani â€" whose campaign is supported by Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president who was barred from running this year â€" pressed his attack on the broadcaster further, saying (in Mr. Karami’s translation):

I wish there were justice at IRIB. I wish there were constructive criticism, which we would be thankful for. But if someone is attacked and accused on IRIB, for them not to have to call the head of the IRIB and see if he has permission to go on or not. It would be good if someone was attacked one night and the next morning they would be invited and have the opportunity to speak too. Many prominent figures, many people who have been lashed with a whip in the Shah’s government, many people who were close to Ayatollah Khomeini, have been insulted on IRIB. Unfortunately, IRIB has not acted justly.

Mr. Abedini, tell the head of your organization that those who have been insulted once in a while, and sometimes some have been insulted a lot, give them time, allow them to defend themselves. It won’t hurt. Don’t waste the capital of the revolution.

A Twitter feed in support of Mr. Rouhani’s campaign explained that the candidate was referring to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s fierce attacks on leaders of the opposition during the last election campaign.

As my colleague Robert Worth reported from Tehran in 2009, during an extraordinary televised debate on the eve of the last election Mr. Ahmadinejad accused Mr. Rafsanjani of stealing billions of dollars of state money and called him ‘the main puppet master’ behind the campaign against him.

Monday’s interview was one of a series of generally bland discussions on state television with each of the eight candidates approved to run. Press TV, Iran’s state-run, English-language satellite channel, ignored the contentious portion of Mr. Rouhani’s interview, choosing to highlight instead his dry remarks on the management of Iran’s economy.

A video excerpt from the Iranian presidential candidate Hassan Rouhani’s interview on state television posted online by Press TV, a government-owned satellite channel.

Robert Mackey also remixes the news on Twitter @robertmackey.



Witnesses Describe Killings in Syria to BBC

As my colleagues Anne Barnard and Hania Mourtada reported earlier this month, residents, opposition activists and human rights monitors in Syria said that hundreds of civilians were killed by forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad in two Sunni Muslim enclaves in the largely Alawite and Christian province of Tartus.

On Tuesday, the BBC broadcast interviews with women who said they had witnessed atrocities in the village of Bayda and the nearby city of Baniyas in a video report from Syria by the correspondent Ian Pannell.

The claims of massacres in the region come two years after unrest there was first documented in video posted online, showing a brutal security crackdown by pro-Assad fighters on the men of Bayda and protests outside the town by its women.

One section of Mr. Pannell’s report, about 70 seconds in, features video said to have been recorded by a member of a pro-Assad militia after the massacre this month in Bayda’s main square. The blood-stained square will be familiar to readers who were following the conflict two years ago, when another leaked clip, shot from almost the exact same vantage point, showed pro-Assad fighters kicking and standing on the bodies of the town’s men, who were forced to lie face down on the ground with their hands bound behind their backs.

Video, said to show a security crackdown in the Syrian town of Bayda in April, 2011, was posted online by opposition activists that month.

Robert Mackey also remixes the news on Twitter @robertmackey.



Discuss Rape and Justice in Pakistan With Reporters From The Times and ‘Frontline’

Readers of The Lede are invited to join a discussion of the issues raised by the documentary “Outlawed in Pakistan,” to be broadcast Tuesday night on PBS. The film, part of the “Frontline” series, follows the case of Kainat Soomro, a young woman who accused four men of gang-raping her when she was just 13 years old.

As the film aims to show, Ms. Soomro’s long battle for justice illustrated how dangerous speaking out about rape can be in Pakistan, where the legal system and tribal customs forced her family to uproot their lives and endure threats.

On Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern time, The New York Times’s Islamabad bureau chief, Declan Walsh, will discuss “Outlawed in Pakistan” with the directors of the film, Habiba Nosheen and Hilke Schellmann. Submit your questions ahead of time using the form below and return here to follow the conversation once it begins.



Newborn Rescued From Sewer Pipe in China Reportedly in Good Condition

Video broadcast repeatedly on Chinese state television in recent days showed the intense rescue of a newborn who spent his first few hours on Earth trapped in a sewer pipe directly beneath the toilet where his mother had unexpectedly given birth.

Video broadcast on Chinese state television showed the rescue of a newborn from a sewer pipe in the Zhejiang Province city of Jinhua on Saturday.

The images, which circulated widely on Chinese social networks, showed that rescuers in Jinhua, who could see a tiny foot beneath the toilet when they arrived on Saturday, sawed off the section of pipe the baby was trapped in and brought it to a nearby hospital, where they worked with doctors to cut him loose.

Three days after the baby was extracted from the pipe, a search for the infant’s parents ended as a woman who was on the scene during the entire rescue admitted to the police that she was the boy’s mother, the state-run Zhejiang News reported.

A police officer told Britain’s Sky News on Tuesday that the boy was healthy enough to be discharged from the hospital. The unnamed police source also told the broadcaster that the mother, who had hidden her pregnancy, was the first to call for help, alerting her landlord to “weird noises” from the toilet. The landlord then spotted the child and called the authorities.

Before the mother came forward, CNN reported, the police in Jinhua had posted a message on the Chinese social network Sina Weibo reading: “Mom, come back! The baby is resilient and alive. Please show up, Mom. This is your own baby and he should return to your warm embrace soon.”

Comments directed and the infant’s mother and father by other Weibo users were less kind, Reuters reports. “The parents who did this have hearts even filthier than that sewage pipe,” one user wrote.

Robert Mackey also remixes the news on Twitter @robertmackey.



Newborn Rescued From Sewer Pipe in China Reportedly in Good Condition

Video broadcast repeatedly on Chinese state television in recent days showed the intense rescue of a newborn who spent his first few hours on Earth trapped in a sewer pipe directly beneath the toilet where his mother had unexpectedly given birth.

Video broadcast on Chinese state television showed the rescue of a newborn from a sewer pipe in the Zhejiang Province city of Jinhua on Saturday.

The images, which circulated widely on Chinese social networks, showed that rescuers in Jinhua, who could see a tiny foot beneath the toilet when they arrived on Saturday, sawed off the section of pipe the baby was trapped in and brought it to a nearby hospital, where they worked with doctors to cut him loose.

Three days after the baby was extracted from the pipe, a search for the infant’s parents ended as a woman who was on the scene during the entire rescue admitted to the police that she was the boy’s mother, the state-run Zhejiang News reported.

A police officer told Britain’s Sky News on Tuesday that the boy was healthy enough to be discharged from the hospital. The unnamed police source also told the broadcaster that the mother, who had hidden her pregnancy, was the first to call for help, alerting her landlord to “weird noises” from the toilet. The landlord then spotted the child and called the authorities.

Before the mother came forward, CNN reported, the police in Jinhua had posted a message on the Chinese social network Sina Weibo reading: “Mom, come back! The baby is resilient and alive. Please show up, Mom. This is your own baby and he should return to your warm embrace soon.”

Comments directed and the infant’s mother and father by other Weibo users were less kind, Reuters reports. “The parents who did this have hearts even filthier than that sewage pipe,” one user wrote.

Robert Mackey also remixes the news on Twitter @robertmackey.



Monday, May 27, 2013

Indians Grow Impatient With Taciturn Premier Amid Troubles

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don't have an account yet?
Create an account '

Subscribed through iTunes and need an NYTimes.com account?
Learn more '



Maoist Attack Kills Dozens in India

Maoist Attack Kills Dozens in India

NEW DELHI - Hundreds of Maoist guerrillas ambushed a convoy of top state political leaders in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh on Saturday and killed at least 27 people, including three leaders of the nationally dominant Indian National Congress Party.

India's former federal minister, Vidya Charan Shukla, 83, who was injured in Saturday's Maoist attack in a densely forested area, was brought to a hospital in Raipur, in Chhattisgarh State, on Sunday.

The attackers blocked the road by felling trees, forcing the convoy of vehicles to a halt, according to the Press Trust of India news agency. The guerrillas set off a land mine that blew up one of the stopped vehicles, and then they opened fire on those remaining. Officials estimated that 200 to 300 guerrillas were involved.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh condemned the attack “as a dastardly and anti-democratic act,” and the Congress Party president, Sonia Gandhi, said the ambush was “an attack on democratic values.”

“We are shocked, astounded and pained by the attack on our colleagues in Chhattisgarh,” Mrs. Gandhi said.

Rahul Gandhi, Mrs. Gandhi's son and the Congress Party vice president, left for Chhattisgarh early Sunday, and the prime minister and Mrs. Gandhi were expected to follow him there later in the day.

Nand Kumar Patel, president of the state branch of the Congress Party, his newly married son, and Mahendra Karma, a senior member of the party, were all killed in the attack, said Mukesh Gupta, a top state police official.

The victims were headed to Jagdalpur from Sukma. The attack was in a heavily forested area between two valleys sometime between 5 p.m. and 6 p.m., Mr. Gupta said.

Both party leaders had personal police bodyguards, many of whom died in the attack. Mr. Karma was even afforded a bulletproof vehicle, although he was not riding in the vehicle at the time, Mr. Gupta said. Similarly, Mr. Patel always had a heavy police presence around him.

Mr. Karma had long been a target of Maoist anger because of his association with Salwa Judum, a local militia he founded to combat the guerrillas but that was accused of atrocities against the local tribal population. Such tribal groups are among the most marginalized citizens in Indian society and constitute the backbone of the Maoist insurgency that has kindled across the eastern middle of the country.

The attack was one of the most audacious recent strikes by guerrillas. The number of attacks and the deaths associated with them surged in 2009 and 2010 but had waned in the past two years, with some hoping that the central government's growing welfare outreach - including food and jobs programs - had cut support for the insurgents.

Indeed, India's governing coalition touted last week the decline in Maoist attacks and deaths as one of its signature achievements.

The Maoists confiscated the weapons of the dead police officers and then fled, Mr. Gupta said. The wounded were taken to area hospitals. Troops have begun to comb the area for the guerrillas, Mr. Gupta said.

The prime minister called the Chhattisgarh chief minister Saturday night to ask whether he needed additional forces. As the two men are members of opposing parties, the state and national response to the attack is a delicate political dance. State leaders have gained considerable power in recent years at the expense of the central government. But security is one of the few areas in which the central government has become less deferential, promising to send in the army at the first sign of serious unrest or rioting.

A version of this article appeared in print on May 27, 2013, in The International Herald Tribune.

Amma\'s Multifaceted Empire, Built on Hugs

Amma's Multifaceted Empire, Built on Hugs

THERE are entourages - and then there is the retinue of Mata Amritanandamayi, a 59-year-old Indian guru known simply as Amma, or “mother.” On Friday, she began a two-month North American tour during which she will be accompanied by 275 volunteers. They plan to ride in four buses across the continent from Bellevue, Wash., to Marlborough, Mass., visiting 11 cities, including New York. And at each stop along the way, Amma will sit on stage for 15 hours at a stretch, greeting her thousands of devotees.

An Amma embrace at the ashram.

Amma is best known for literally embracing the masses; she has hugged millions of people around the world, a feat that has earned her the nickname “the hugging saint.” Her status as a spiritual therapist has attracted a large following in the United States. In India, however, what Amma offers is far more significant and complex. She has built a vast organization that is the envy of both India's public and private sectors. As Oommen Chandy, the chief minister of the state of Kerala, told me: “From nothing, she has built an empire.”

I first heard about Amma roughly a year ago, when I was living in India teaching journalism as a Fulbright scholar. People kept telling me about a former fishing village in Kerala, in southern India, that was now a utopia in the jungle. Visitors talked about a mega-ashram, complete with a modern university and free health care, and described it as a gleaming cityscape where foreigners in pristine white uniforms swept the streets and scrubbed bird droppings off park benches. The entire community supposedly worshiped a middle-aged woman whose devotees came by the thousands, hailing her as a demigod.

They said she performed miracles, diverting storms and turning water into pudding. They said she'd built a place where everything, from light switches to recycling plants, worked as it was meant to - and, in India, this was perhaps the greatest miracle of all.

Lured by these tales, I decided to visit this place, called Amritapuri, to see for myself. To get there, I rode in a taxi through the backwaters of Kerala, past villages where bare-chested men fished from dugout canoes, a landscape that, unlike much of India, has changed little in centuries. When I saw high-rise buildings jutting above the canopy of palm trees, it was clear we were getting close. Traditionally, ashrams are quiet and secluded - much like monasteries - but Amma's ashram was so vast and built up that it resembled a small metropolis.

After exiting the taxi at the main gate - there are no cars within the ashram itself - I set out on a series of footpaths that wound through a 100-acre campus containing the buildings of Amrita University (also founded by Amma) as well as dormitories, temples, restaurants and shops. I eventually reached a great hall where people were gathered, waiting patiently to meet Amma.

With the sort of effort required to navigate a New York City subway car at rush hour, I made my way through the crowd toward Amma, who was perched on a cushioned chair on a stage. One by one, people dropped to their knees and let her cradle them. In a span of roughly four minutes, she consoled a sobbing woman, chatted with an aged man and conducted a wedding. One of Amma's many attendants, a volunteer who served as her press aide, helped me nudge, wedge and high-step my way to a coveted spot of honor at Amma's feet.

I asked Amma how she maintained this pace. She smiled. Then she pinched my cheek and began to tickle me - the way a mother might tease a troublesome toddler - and said through an interpreter, “I am connected to the eternal energy source, so I am not like a battery that gets used up.”

In fact, Amma has energized an entire organization that often fills the vacuum left by government. When a tsunami devastated parts of southern India in 2004, it took the state government of Kerala five days merely to announce what it would do by way of aid and relief. Amma, however, began a response within hours, providing food and shelter to thousands of people; in the following years, her organization says, it has built more than 6,000 houses.

How Amma's efforts are paid for remains something of a mystery. Her organization raises about $20 million a year from sources worldwide, according to a spokesman, but in India, the finances are not public. And the M.A. Center, her United States organization, is registered as a church and thus doesn't have to disclose its finances the way secular tax-exempt groups do.

But this doesn't seem to have dissuaded would-be donors. In 2003, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, then the president of India, was so impressed with Amma's charitable work that he donated almost his entire annual salary to her organization. His enthusiasm may stem from the simple fact that Amma appears to do what politicians cannot. Mr. Chandy, the chief minister of Kerala, told me rather dejectedly, “The government has so many limitations, but Amma gives an order and next day the work will start.”

I WOKE up after my first night in the ashram to Amma's plump, smiling face looming from a giant portrait above my bed. There was no escaping her gaze. Her photographs were everywhere - offices, lobbies, hallways, dining rooms, even elevators.

On the way to the cafe for breakfast, I passed a printing operation and met a bright-eyed worker who told me that his crew had just finished a production run of Amma's biography, in Russian. This authorized story of Amma's life, which has been translated into 31 languages, intertwines a tale of grinding Indian poverty with the fantastical: She was born poor, into a low caste, but as a child would give away whatever valuables the family had to the less fortunate, which prompted her father to tie her to a tree and beat her. From an early age, she hugged strangers. She eventually left home to live in the wild, where the biography relates that she survived by eating whatever she could find, a diet that included shards of glass and human feces.

By the time she was a young woman, the biography continues, she was performing miracles - kissing cobras, diverting rainstorms and feeding more than a thousand people from a single, small pot.

Gurus emerged thousands of years ago in India as learned explainers of the Upanishads, philosophical teachings underpinning the Hindu religion.

“The guru was someone to be awed,” says Karen Pechilis, an expert in female gurus who teaches comparative religion at Drew University in Madison, N.J. “You stand back, you keep your distance, and you are dazzled.” They generally weren't big on snuggling.

Amma turned this notion on its head, Professor Pechilis says, by combining the role of the spiritual guide with that of the mother who protects and comforts.

Amma's transformation from an eccentric girl into the mother guru started in the late 1970s. Word of her hugging spread, and she received a steady stream of visitors, many of them Americans like Neal Rosner, a Chicago native, who would take up residence. Mr. Rosner, who moved to India after graduating from high school and still lives at Amritapuri, told me he was one of the first to donate a significant amount - $10,000 from selling a rare coin collection - to improve the ashram. Before long, it had a dormitory, a free medical clinic and a vocational job-training center.

And then Amma was crisscrossing the globe to promote her Hindu philosophy, which espouses love, introspection and selflessness, as well as her many charities, which now include hunger and disaster relief, free health care for the poor, orphanages and recycling efforts.

Her trips have become increasingly elaborate. In each city, she takes over a hotel or a convention center, where she feeds and hugs thousands of well-wishers. Events also occur at Amma's satellite ashrams; she has eight in the United States, including a 164-acre campus near San Ramon, Calif. The tours have helped Amma expand her following and generate donations for her hospital and her charities.

Over breakfast in Amritapuri, I chatted with Dante Sawyer, an American who has lived in the ashram for more than a decade and volunteers in the foreign visitors office. As I sipped my cappuccino, perused the cafe's pizza menu and contemplated a swim in the ashram's pool, I asked if these amenities weren't a bit indulgent for a spiritual place.

“If this were a traditional ashram with just huts and rice gruel, there would not be this many people, or they would come for a day and then get the hell out,” he said. “Amma feels it would be a tragedy if people didn't come here for their vacation because they couldn't get a pizza - so, O.K., we have pizza.”

ONE day, Amma offered lunch to a gathering of several hundred devotees in an ornate temple. A team of 20 women scooped rice and curry onto plates that they passed from hand to hand - old-fashioned-fire-brigade style - until they reached Amma. Then she personally handed the meals to the followers. One of those receiving a plate was Maneesha Sudheer, a computer scientist at Amrita University.

Dr. Sudheer gained some attention for developing a landslide-detection program that impressed R. Chidambaram, the principal scientific adviser to the Indian government. One of Mr. Chidambaram's goals is to create a system to predict Himalayan landslides, which cause hundreds of deaths and costly damages each year. The technology seemed so promising that Mr. Chidambaram made a trip to visit Amma at the ashram. He told me that Amma, who has only a fourth-grade education, was “far more successful” than the Indian government in attracting top-caliber scientific minds.

Dr. Sudheer invited me to her lab at the university, reached by a short walk from the temple. She showed me a gigantic landslide simulator that she had helped design to test her wireless landslide sensors. Many of the labs looked like ones you might see at M.I.T., save for the fact that Amma's picture was displayed more or less everywhere.

Amrita University has 17,000 students, who pay tuition that is much higher than that of state-run schools. Critics complain that the university caters mainly to the wealthy, and to a great extent it does, but it's hard to argue with the school's success. Its medical school is generally well regarded, and Amrita also offers a dual-degree program in business with the State University of New York at Buffalo.

“We call Amma the best headhunter there is,” said Bipin Nair, who is a dean of Amrita's school of biotechnology and is leading an effort to create an affordable insulin pump for diabetics. “Every year, when she comes back from a trip to North America or Europe, she has a list of people who have expressed their desire to be a part of the ashram.”

Born and schooled in India, Mr. Nair did postdoctoral work at the University of Tennessee at Memphis. He landed a job at a biotech company in Seattle and bought a six-bedroom house, and yet he felt dissatisfied. He and his wife, Dr. Geetha Kumar, met Amma during one of her American tours and decided to move to the ashram in 2004.

Mr. Nair does not take a salary, working only for room and board. “What we live in now is probably smaller than most bathrooms in the U.S.,” he told me, but added: “I don't have to do anything. I am not paying a mortgage. I am not cooking, cleaning or shopping - everything is taken care of - all I need to do here is focus on my work.”

People who work without pay keep costs down at the ashram, a selling point that entices donors. “When someone gives one dollar to Amma,” one ashram spokesman told me, “it is really worth 100 times more than that, because if you give that same money to another institution, they have to pay the administrative costs.” Benefactors have included people like Jeff Robinov, the president of the Warner Bros. Pictures Group.

Amma's fund-raising success, especially within India, also hinges on the fact that people “trust her more than the government,” which is so mired in red tape as to be ineffectual, says John Kattakayam, a sociology professor at the University of Kerala, who studies the role of women in Indian society. Amma inspires this trust, he said, even though there is no financial transparency at the ashram and “everything is secret.”

The ashram's treasurer, Swami Ramakrishnananda, acknowledged that its finances were not open to the public, but he added that it is audited annually both by the Indian government and by the ashram's own internal auditors. I asked if there was an official, like a chief compliance officer, who could be contacted if people saw money being misused. “Yes, of course,” Mr. Ramakrishnananda replied. “They can go directly to Amma.”

In the United States, a charitable organization typically has to file for tax-exempt status, be approved by the I.R.S. and then file an annual Form 990 detailing, among other things, how much money it collected, what it paid its top employees, who served on its board, and whether it spent money on lobbying. If, however, an organization declares itself a church - as Amma's center in the United States does - it is not required to do this and there is far less transparency and public scrutiny.

In general when it comes to religious organizations, there is a “possibility for abuse,” says Roger Colinvaux, a law professor and expert on tax-exempt organizations at the Catholic University of America. “Churches don't have to apply for tax-exempt status, they don't have to file an information return, and it is difficult for the I.R.S. to audit them.”

V.S. Somanath, dean of Amrita's business school, said: “By God's grace we have not been hit by any scandal, and so people are willing to open their wallets and their purses. The image is clean. Amma is like Jack Welch - she's a great communicator - and the growth is spectacular.”

LATE one evening, Amma granted me an interview in her cramped sleeping quarters, which felt all the smaller because several of her advisers, dressed in saffron-colored garb, were also present, sitting cross-legged on the floor. There was also a press liaison, a two-man camera crew and an interpreter who relayed my questions from English into the local language of Malayalam.

“You are not like a guest to me,” Amma told me as I sat down. “Your doubts will be the doubts of the world. So you may ask anything.” Her tone was intimate. Everyone waited for me to speak.

I soon broached the subject of the failure of the Indian government to provide services. She told me: “It is like somebody gets bitten by a snake and, by the time they figure out what kind of snake it is, the person dies. That is what happens with government intervention.”

The most striking example of this, she said, occurred after the 2004 tsunami, when her relief operation effectively stepped in for the government.

More recently, in 2011, Amma organized a cleanup at Sabarimala, a mountaintop temple in southern India, which attracts religious pilgrims - more than Mecca each year - who leave thousands of tons of trash. Ostensibly, the man to fix this problem was K. Jayakumar, who manages Kerala's nearly one million government employees. Mr. Jayakumar, however, told me bluntly that, in his experience, you simply couldn't pay people to do this kind of work well. So he called Amma.

She dispatched 4,000 followers, who got the job done in a few days. At the time, Amma was in Spain on a hugging tour, but she monitored the cleanup via webcam. She succeeded where the government failed, and for a simple reason, Mr. Jayakumar told me: she possessed divine authority.

“It is an advantage,” he said. “The only thing is, if she makes a mistake, nobody will point it out.”

During our chat, Amma told me that she and her “children” never disagree and that this was one key to her success. “Even if the people in the government stand together and do things, they can't implement their actions without discussing it over several meetings,” she said. “I'm not blaming them, but this is the only way they can do it.”

Wasn't there ever a single occasion, I asked, when one of her devotees contradicted or doubted her? “To date there has been no major difference of opinion between Amma and her children,” she told me, matter-of-factly. “Until now, we have functioned as one mind.” What's more, Amma said, she always led by example. “I am the first person to get down into the septic tank and clean the feces,” she said.

Perhaps inevitably, Amma's authority occasionally ends up shaping the personal lives of her followers. I talked to one middle-aged American follower who said he racked up $40,000 in credit-card debt for multiple trips to India to see Amma. “I figured people take loans for education, for houses, for cars,” he said. “I'm doing it for my spiritual growth.” Two of my guides later tried to dissuade me from talking further with the man.

Another foreigner, who has lived at the ashram for years, told me that longtime residents were “not supposed to make big life-changing decisions without telling Amma.” She sometimes has “really strong opinions about whether certain people should have kids,” said the devotee, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of being identified as a dissenter within the community.

In our conversation, Amma was adamant that she does not tell her devotees when to marry, whether to have children or how to live their lives, and she seemed intent on dispelling the notion that her organization was in any way a cult.

“I don't like it when people say that I have divine powers,” she told me. (This preference had not influenced her authorized biography, however, which discussed at length the miracles she had performed.) “I don't tell people that you can only attain enlightenment through one way,” she said. “If you think love is a cult, then I can't do anything. My religion is love.”

DURING the days I spent at the ashram, devotees kept asking me if I sensed Amma's divinity. My honest feeling was, not really. That being said, I understand how other people might feel that way about her - especially in India, where the failure of services and infrastructure is often a given.

In the city where I lived, Trivandrum, the electricity failed so often that whenever I turned off the lights, my 3-year-old son would exclaim, “Power's out!” A more disturbing example involves Bihar, India's poorest state, where the government's public distribution system is supposed to provide free grain to the impoverished masses. But studies have suggested that only between 10 and 45 percent of the grain reaches the intended recipients, with the rest effectively stolen and sold on the black market. All of this is to say that when someone emerges who can get things done properly and efficiently - even some of the time - it's easy to understand why that person can seem superhuman.

This became most apparent to me one afternoon while speaking with Dr. Krishna Kumar, a pediatric cardiologist who trained at Boston Children's Hospital. I followed him around as he met with patients at Amma's AIMS Hospital, a 1,500-bed facility in the nearby city of Kochi. Dr. Kumar said that when he finished his training, in 1996, there were many pediatric cardiologists in the United States and just a handful in India. That fact alone inspired him to return to the subcontinent.

“I thought I should use my training to make some difference back in India,” he told me. He said he landed a job at a private hospital in New Delhi but quickly became “deeply disheartened” that the hospital was turning away 90 percent of would-be patients because they couldn't pay; that number included children who might die from a heart problem that he could have fixed.

Dr. Kumar said he wanted to practice medicine in a different way but saw no other options. Then, one day in 1997, he got a call from Ron Gottsegen, the chief executive of Amma's hospital, who encouraged him to come work for Amma. “I was very skeptical,” Dr. Kumar said. “I didn't believe that a religious leader could run a medical institution.”

Even when he met Amma, he wasn't entirely convinced. When I asked him if he ever had a spiritual epiphany in her presence, he replied: “Not at all - nothing like that whatsoever.” Instead, he said, Amma has “grown on me” over time. He is grateful to her, he said, for giving him a chance to build the kind of practice that helps poor people. At Amma's hospital, patients must pay at least some portion of their bill, though often it is a minimal amount.

Late in the day, Dr. Kumar met the mother of a teenager who had just had open-heart surgery, at almost no cost. He told the mother, who worked as a maid and earned roughly $40 a month, that her daughter would be fine. The woman was so overcome with relief that she began to weep and dropped to her knees and touched her head to the doctor's feet, and then to my feet as well. Afterward, I asked Dr. Kumar what that was about.

“It is a sign of extreme respect,” he replied uncomfortably. “As doctors, we almost have a godlike status in India. It is unfortunate - we do not deserve it - we are just human.”

LAST July, near the end of another two-month United States tour by Amma, I traveled to Alexandria, Va., where she was holding a hugging session at a Hilton hotel. The place bustled: there were families who traveled with Amma for their summer vacations and first-timers who wandered in on a whim.

“My therapist told me to come,” Leslie Sargent, a high-school guidance counselor, said. Moments later I met the therapist, Sharon Bauer, who seemed pleased to see her patient. “The energy that Amma transmits deepens our sense of inner essence,” she said.

Amma's organization says that the purpose of these events is not to raise money and that foreign contributions account for only a third of all donations. Nonetheless, donation boxes were placed at almost every turn, and donations can be quite sizable. In 2009, one benefactor bought the former home of Sargent Shriver and Eunice Kennedy Shriver near Washington for $7.8 million and donated it to Amma as a local meeting house.

The entire back portion of the Hilton's ballroom had been converted into a mini-mall, where visitors could buy an array of Amma-related products. At one shop, some crystals cost as much as $500. A vendor told me that “if Amma touches the crystal, some of her energy goes into it.”

A medicinal shop sold a tincture from the flowers in Amma's garland that promised to fight “colds, flus, stomach aches and even cancer.” And, next to a pole on which four security cameras were mounted, a table was laden with sweaters, bathrobes and nightgowns. “These are items that Amma has worn,” the saleswoman said.

Proceeds from all the sales go to Amma's organization, for charitable work and to cover expenses.

As I mingled with the shoppers, I bumped into a couple from Washington, D.C. - Ian and Debra Mishalove - who run a yoga studio. Mr. Mishalove had just bought two necklaces.

I asked what motivated them to support Amma financially. “I know very little about what she does,” he acknowledged, “but I have seen literature about her helping people in need.”

“She has charities alleviating hunger and helping with disasters,” his wife added.

“This is the nicest kind of commerce,” he said.

We parted ways, and I headed over to the jewelry shop where Mr. Mishalove had just bought the necklaces. The saleswoman, Nihsima Sandhu, 48, from San Francisco, told me that she previously worked at Saks Fifth Avenue, but that she now sold jewelry for Amma instead, which gave her much more satisfaction.

The saleswoman paused to tell a customer that Amma had, in fact, touched a particular item. Does that mean, I inquired, that the item is blessed? The saleswoman smiled and then assured me, “Everything in this room is blessed.”

A version of this article appeared in print on May 26, 2013, on page BU1 of the New York edition with the headline: The Empire Built on Hugs.

Temple Art Come to Life: The Odissi Classical Style in Full Flower

Temple Art Come to Life: The Odissi Classical Style in Full Flower

Orissa Dance Academy at Ailey Studios

How marvelous, amid the furor of the ballet spring season at Lincoln Center, to spend an evening watching top-level Indian dance - and to recall that its Odissi genre is not only far older than ballet but just as beautiful, classical and compelling. Pure dance and “speaking” mime alternate and overlap; every part of the body is involved, not the least fingers and eyes; the tilt of the shoulder line from one diagonal to another becomes a richly harmonic effect, like a change from one full chord to another; long-held poses sing out with powerfully sculptural effect amid rapid rhythms.

Orissa Dance Academy From left, Arupa Gayatri Panda, Aruna Mohanty and Puja Jena of Orissa Dance Academy at Ailey Studios.

On Friday night the Orissa Dance Academy, a troupe making its first visit to New York at the end of an American tour, gave a single performance at the Ailey Studios. I had seen the troupe only in rehearsal last year at its home studios in Bhubaneswar, Orissa, the eastern Indian state from which the style derives. My impression then was that this was one of India's finest companies; Friday's performance confirmed this. It is directed by Aruna Mohanty, the company's most petite and remarkable performer, who dances its main solos and proves compellingly expressive. But on this tour she is joined by 10 other dancers - 6 men, 4 women - who display an impressive array of styles. I've never been so aware of the diversity of which Odissi is capable.

The program's two main drawbacks were taped music and no intermission, despite a two-hour running time. Taped music is often used in India, even in festival performances, but I couldn't help recalling how, at that Bhubaneswar rehearsal, music was played live (and recorded): the change in atmosphere and immediacy is intense.

Ms. Mohanty's solo, “Ramate Yamuna,” was the evening's most enchanting item. Illustrating part of Jayadeva's love poem “Gita Govinda” from the perspective of Radha as she searches for Krishna among trees and vines beside the river Yamuna, it demonstrated Odissi's capacity for abhinaya (expressive mime), but also moved seamlessly in and out of dance passages. (In all forms of Indian classical dance, abhinaya has much more dance potential than does explanatory mime in 19th-century ballet.)

The focus of Ms. Mohanty's gestures, often addressing one fixed point as if in dialogue with a person unseen by the audience, was itself spellbinding, opening up an interior world of the mind. At one point Ms. Mohanty indicated her heart to disclose love's wound; a moment later she rubbed the spot, now recovering from her affliction. Advancing or retreating, her rhythm made Radha's journey through space vivid. The placing of the ball of a foot, the opening of a hand as if sounding a bell, the movement of her torso as if softly blown by feeling: all wonderful.

Yet the larger revelations of the evening were in the group dances, showing Odissi's potential for ensemble complexity. The program included an introductory “Pancha Bhuta” invocation, representing the elements of nature; a pure-dance “Pallavi”; and “Rasa in Ramayana,” a depiction of seven of the nine universal emotions (rasas) as enacted in the epic “Ramayana.” Facets of the history of Odissi emerged, with references to the Gotipua boy performers (playing women's roles and using acrobatic backbends). The male performers were far from alike - one was broad-chested, another willow-slender - but all showed the enthralling Odissi qualities for physical pliancy, rhythmic vigor, hewing and holding three-dimensional shapes, and eloquently communicative face and hands.

Another dance, “Srusti ‘O' Pralaya” (“Creation and Destruction”), led by Ms. Mohanty, featured some of the evening's most ravishing steps and gestures. The final tableau - with all the dancers surrounding Ms. Mohanty like a close grove, while she alone rippled - haunts the memory.

And the finale - in which Ms. Mohanty did not dance - showed, with ever more intensity, the full resources of Odissi. Called “Swargaadapi Gariyasi: Vande Mataram,” it drew imagery from the dance bas-reliefs at the great temple at Konark; while its fullness of footwork and upper-body vitality made as much impact as any sculpturally statuesque moments. Arms fluttered, shoulders were shaken, hands clapped. The flat soles of feet were stamped percussively, dancers advanced making pulsating use of heel or the ball of the foot, and the action of instep and thigh in sideways-skipping steps was irresistible. The stage was constantly enlivened by changing group geometries. May this company return to New York soon.

A version of this review appeared in print on May 27, 2013, on page C5 of the New York edition with the headline: Temple Art Come to Life: The Odissi Classical Style in Full Flower.

Cow Thefts on the Rise in India

For New Breed of Rustlers, Nothing Is Sacred

Enrico Fabian for The New York Times

Taking a break at Shri Mataji Gaushala, a shelter in Uttar Pradesh, India, for thousands of cattle. The eating of beef is becoming more common in India.

NEW DELHI - When night falls in this gritty capital, gangs troll the darkened streets looking for easy prey among a portion of the city's vast homeless population; thousands have been rounded up and carried off in trucks in recent years.

Many cows are being stolen from the streets of India. Often, those that are rescued and taken to the shelter are in poor condition.

The police say they have increased patrols and set up roadblocks in an effort to stop the trafficking. In some cases, officers have infiltrated gangs in hopes of catching them in the act. But the brutal kidnappings continue, and the victims - scrawny cows, which are slowly losing their sacred status among some in India - are slaughtered and sold for meat and leather.

Cattle rustling, called “lifting” here, is a growing scourge in New Delhi, as increasingly affluent Indians develop a taste for meat, even the flesh of cows, which are considered sacred in Hinduism. Criminals round up some of the roughly 40,000 cattle that wander the streets of this megacity and sell them to illegal slaughterhouses located in villages not far away.

Many of the cattle in Delhi are part of dairy operations and their owners have neither the land nor the money to keep them penned. So the animals graze on grassy medians or ubiquitous piles of trash. Others too old to be milked are often abandoned and left to wander the streets until they die - or get picked up by the rustlers.

Posses of police officers give chase to the outlaws, but the desperados - driving souped-up dump trucks - think little of ramming police cars and breaking through barricades. They have even pushed cows into the pathways of their pursuers, forcing horrified officers to swerve out of the way to avoid what for many is still a grievous sin.

“These gangs mostly go after stray cattle, but they will also steal motorcycles and scooters,” one police officer, Bhisham Singh, said in an interview. “They kidnapped a woman recently and gang-raped her.”

Behind the cattle rustling is a profound shift in Indian society. Meat consumption - chicken, primarily - is becoming acceptable even among Hindus. India is now the world's largest dairy producer, its largest cattle producer and its largest beef exporter, having surpassed Brazil last year, according to the United States Department of Agriculture.

Much of that exported beef is from buffalo (India has half of the world's buffalo population), which are not considered holy. But officials in Andhra Pradesh recently estimated that there are 3,100 illegal slaughterhouses in the state compared with just six licensed ones, and a recent newspaper investigation found that tens of thousands of cattle are sold annually for slaughter from a market in just one of that state's 64 districts. Killing cows is illegal in much of India, and some states outlaw the possession of cow meat.

Much of the illicit beef is probably sold as buffalo, an easy way to hide a sacrilegious act. But sometimes it makes its way to meat sellers in Delhi whose cellphone numbers are passed around in whispers. Steaks can be ordered from these illicit vendors in transactions that are carried out like drug deals.

Beef from cattle is also widely consumed by Muslims and Dalits, among India's most marginalized citizens. Indeed, meat consumption is growing the most among the poor, government statistics show, with overall meat eating growing 14 percent from 2010 to 2012.

Anuj Agrawal, 28, said he grew up in a strictly vegetarian Hindu household but tried chicken for the first time in his teens when he was at a restaurant with friends. He now eats every kind of meat, including beef steaks and burgers. “Once you taste meat, you're not going back to just fruits and vegetables,” Mr. Agrawal said.

He says many of his friends have made similar transitions. But he never eats meat with his grandparents: “I would be excommunicated if I did, so I go pure ‘veg' when I'm with them. I want to inherit something.”

To some extent, the growing acceptance of beef is a result of the government's intense focus on increasing milk production, which has led to a proliferation of foreign cattle breeds that do not elicit the same reverence as indigenous ones, said Clementien Pauws, president of Karuna Society for Animals and Nature, an animal welfare agency in Andhra Pradesh.

“Cows are all about business and money now, not religion,” Ms. Pauws said. “They're all taken to slaughterhouses. It's terrible.”

This is not to say that eating beef from cattle is widely accepted. The vast majority of Hindus still revere cows, and the Bharatiya Janata Party, one of the country's two major political parties, has demanded that laws against cow slaughter be strengthened.

Some landlords even refuse to rent to those who confess to a taste for meat.

But the demand for beef keeps rising, many here say, and with it the prevalence of cattle rustling. Last year, the police in Delhi arrested 150 rustlers, a record number. This year, arrests have continued to surge, Mr. Singh said.

Typically, the rustlers creep into the city at night. When the criminals spot stray cattle and few onlookers they stop the truck, push out a ramp and use a rope to lead the cow to its doom.

The thieves can usually fit about 10 cows on a truck, and each fetches 5,000 rupees - about $94. In a country where more than 800 million people live on less than $2 a day, a single night's haul of more than $900 represents serious temptation.

One man who has helped the police in neighboring Uttar Pradesh said the rustlers were often able to bribe their way to freedom. “Even if they're sent to jail, they come out in 10 to 15 days and commit the same crimes again,” said the man, who did not want his name used for fear of reprisals.

The unfortunate fate of some of Delhi's cattle has led some Hindus to establish cattle shelters on the fringes of the metropolitan region. One of the largest is Shri Mataji Gaushala, where thousands of cattle live on about 42 acres.

Sometimes, the rescue comes too late. Brijinder Sharma, the shelter manager, whose office walls are decorated with drawings of Lord Krishna hugging a calf, showed a video of a truck packed with cattle that was seized on its way to an illegal slaughterhouse. Many of the cows had already died of heat exhaustion.

“The social and religious status of cows has been under attack in India,” Mr. Sharma said. He hopes that his shelter, which has an annual budget of $5.4 million, underwritten almost entirely by wealthy Indians who have emigrated to the United States, will help reverse that trend.

The afternoon feeding at the shelter attracted a crowd of happy onlookers. Abhishek, a one-named cowhand, called out among the lowing throng: “Sakhi! Sakhi!” A large cow with huge horns rushed to the front of the herd, and Mr. Abhishek kissed her on the nose. The cow responded by licking one entire side of his face, and Mr. Abhishek beamed.

Hari Kumar contributed reporting.

A version of this article appeared in print on May 27, 2013, on page A4 of the New York edition with the headline: For New Breed Of Rustlers, Nothing Is Sacred.

Guards in India Were Outgunned, Attack Survivor Says

Guards in India Were Outgunned, Attack Survivor Says

NEW DELHI - A survivor of one of the worst guerrilla attacks in India's long-running Maoist insurgency said Sunday that the security force guarding the ambushed convoy of top state political leaders in the state of Chhattisgarh was outnumbered and outgunned during an hourlong firefight.

The police officers assigned to protect the convoy ran out of ammunition during the assault on Saturday, said one of the dozens of survivors, Vivek Bajpai, a businessman and a member of the Indian National Congress Party. With the convoy's guards unable to return fire, 200 to 300 guerrillas emerged from the forest and demanded that the survivors tell them where Mahender Karma and Nandkumar Patel, both top Congress Party leaders, were hiding. When the guerrillas found Mr. Karma they killed him, Mr. Bajpai said.

“I didn't see the killing, but I heard his cries,” Mr. Bajpai, 42, said. “They beat him with rifle butts and shot him many times. And then they celebrated his death, danced near his body, fired celebratory shots in the air and shouted slogans like ‘The enemy is killed.' We thought our turn was coming next.”

The attackers killed 24 people - 8 police officers and 16 civilians, including Mr. Karma and Mr. Patel - and wounded 37, said Mukesh Gupta, senior police officer. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi, the president of the Congress Party, flew to Chhattisgarh on Sunday to visit the wounded, console the grieving and condemn the attackers.

“We will pursue the perpetrators of this crime with urgency, and I can assure the nation that the government is committed to bringing them to justice,” Mr. Singh said.

Rahul Gandhi, the Congress Party vice president, said that the attackers hoped to intimidate the party, but that they would not succeed.

“We are not scared,” Mr. Gandhi said in Chhattisgarh. “We will not run away.”

The attack began with the detonation of a bomb, which forced the vehicles to stop, and continued with a barrage of automatic-weapons fire, Mr. Bajpai said.

“Many of the Maoists were young girls, maybe 20 to 25 years old,” Mr. Bajpai said. The guerrillas, inspired by the Chinese Communist revolutionary leader Mao Zedong, have been demanding land for tenant farmers and jobs for the poor for decades. The rebels are estimated to have thousands of fighters and a significant presence in at least six states.

Mr. Karma had long been a target of their anger because he founded Salwa Judum, a local militia organized to combat the guerrillas that has been accused of atrocities against the local tribal population. Such tribal groups are among India's most marginalized citizens and constitute the backbone of the Maoist insurgency in the eastern middle of the country.

After the killings, the Maoists scolded the survivors for challenging their authority by moving through an area under guerrilla control. They ordered several survivors to put out a fire caused by grenade blasts.

“They said that they were Adivasis and did not want to damage the forest,” Mr. Bajpai said. “Slowly, they started moving toward the jungle and left us behind.”

The Adivasis are tribal people who consider themselves the first residents of India.

A newspaper photographer was the first person on the scene after the attack, Mr. Bajpai said. Later, a contingent of local police officers arrived and took the survivors to Jagdalpur.

A version of this article appeared in print on May 27, 2013, on page A9 of the New York edition with the headline: Guards Were Outgunned, India Attack Survivor Says.

Saturday, May 25, 2013

British Attack Suspect Followed Fringe Preacher Once Considered a Laughingstock

As my colleagues John F. Burns and Alan Cowell report, one of the two knife-wielding assailants who killed an off-duty soldier in London on Wednesday, who then calmly spoke to witnesses while waiting for the police to arrive, has been identified as Michael Adebolajo, a Briton of Nigerian heritage who converted to Islam about a decade ago.

Two former leaders of al-Muhajiroun, an extremist group with a small following that was banned in Britain after terrorist attacks in London in 2005, told reporters on Thursday that the suspect was part of their circle.

The BBC discovered footage of Mr. Adebolajo standing behind Anjem Choudary, a British co-founder of the group and its successor organizations, at an Islamist protest in London in 2007.

In another part of the video, Mr. Adebolajo, who was reportedly raised as a devout Christian by his Nigerian immigrant parents, is seen holding a sign that deplores Britain's “Crusade Against Muslims.” Mr. Choudary told Reuters that Mr. Adebolajo “used to attend a few demonstrations and activities that we used to have in the past,” but that he “would not consider him to be a member of the organization.”

Sheik Omar Bakri Mohammed, a Syrian-born cleric who led al-Muhajiroun until he was expelled from Britain, said in an interview from Lebanon with The Independent that he recalled meeting Mr. Adebolajo. “I knew him as Michael when he came to the meetings, and then he converted and he became known as Abdullah,” he said. “I hear he then started calling himself Mujahid. He asked questions about religion; he was curious. He had first started coming when there was a lot of anger about the Iraq war and the war on terror. Whether I influenced him or not, I do not know. But he was a quiet boy, so something must have happened.”

Sheik Omar also suggested that the killing was not an act of terrorism or a crime according to his interpretation of Islamic law. “Under Islam, this can be justified,” he told The Independent. “He was not targeting civilians. He was taking on a military man in an operation.”

The cleric also told The Guardian that the suspect had attended al-Muhajiroun events at a community center and mosque in Woolwich, where Wednesday's deadly attack was carried out near a military barracks.

Jon Ronson, a British journalist who made a documentary about Sheik Omar's quixotic campaign to bring Britain under Shariah law in 1996, reminded readers on Thursday that he had looked more closely at al-Muhajiroun in a second film made after the terrorist attacks in London on July 7, 2005, “The Tottenham Ayatollah Revisited.”

“The Tottenham Ayatollah Revisited,” Jon Ronson's second documentary about Sheik Omar Bakri Mohammed, broadcast in 2005.

In an essay for The Guardian in 2005, Mr. Ronson argued that Britain might ultimately regret expelling the occasionally buffoonish Sheik Omar, given that his outlandish sermons acted as a powerful magnet for the most extreme young men in his community. “Without Omar clowning around on stage,” he said, “how is Scotland Yard going to monitor the less clownish people who sit in his audience?”

In the introduction to his book “Them: Adventures With Extremists,” Mr. Ronson wrote that Sheik Omar had mixed feelings about how the documentaries had portrayed him as a bumbling, somewhat comic figure making the exaggerated claim that he was Osama bin Laden's “man in London”:

I telephoned Omar on the evening of his arrest. I expected to find him in a defiant mood. But he seemed a little scared. “This is so terrible,” he said. “The police say they may deport me. Why are people linking me to bin Laden? I do not know the man. I have never met him. Why do people say I am bin Laden's man in London?”

“Because you have been calling yourself bin Laden's man in London for years,” I said.

“Oh Jon,” said Omar. “I need you more than ever now. You know I am harmless, don't you? You always said I was laughable, didn't you? Oh Jon. Why don't people believe I am just a harmless clown?”

“I have never thought you were a harmless clown,” I said.

I telephoned Omar a a few weeks later. I asked him if I could follow him around some more, now that a conclusion to his story seemed imminent. His response was startling to me. “You portray me as a fool,” he said. “I will not let you anywhere near me ever again. You hate the Muslims.”

As Mary Fitzgerald, a foreign correspondent for The Irish Times, reported on Twitter, Sheik Omar is now based in Lebanon, where he is fighting terrorist charges and taking part in televised debates on the conflict in Syria.

According to Ms. Fitzgerald, the cleric once told her that his group tended to attract young men who felt themselves to be “caught between cultures and identities” in multicultural Britain.

Mr. Adebolajo, the son of Nigerian immigrants, would seem to fit that description. As The Lede noted on Wednesday, at one point in his statement justifying the killing, as Mr. Adebolajo implored the British citizens in front of him to get their leaders to remove their troops from “our lands,” he seemed to stumble a bit as he used words that betrayed a certain confusion about which community he belonged to, saying: “Tell them to bring our troops back, so we can - so you can all live in peace.”

This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: May 24, 2013

An earlier version of this post misspelled the name of the extremist group with which Michael Adebolajo was associated. It is al-Muhajiroun, not al-Muhijaroun.